T
Terra/ Acme
Acme · West Campus

Portfolio

2 programs live · 2 coming online · all data scoped to its program — nothing intermingles

Programs live
2
2 coming online
Acme-wide tonnage
400
Sum across live programs
Weighted diversion
Portfolio rate
66.5%
Tonnage-weighted across programs
Acme-wide spend
$111K
Sum across live programs
Open flags
Needs review
17
Across live programs
One Terra · two programs
Each program is its own self-contained area
Operational waste (Sara's team) and Construction & Demolition (Jordan's team) run on the same Terra platform but have completely separate data, pages, and workflows. Click into a program to enter it. Hazardous and E-waste come online next.

Why programs are separate

Daily users only see their world

  • · Different teams (Sara's ops vs Jordan's C&D) have different daily workflows
  • · Different source events (recurring invoices vs per-haul tickets)
  • · Different aggregation envelopes (sites/months vs projects)
  • · Different exports (Sphera ESG vs LEED MR-2 packets)
  • · Different rule sets, different facilities, different vocabularies

Why one Terra

The unified pitch sits here, on this screen

  • · One contract, one login, one design system across all programs
  • · Acme-wide ESG rollups feed Sphera from a single source of truth
  • · One ingestion engine, one rules engine — different configurations per program
  • · New programs (haz, e-waste) onboard as new entries here, no parallel procurement
  • · Auditors see one platform, one trail, one vendor